Thoughts and meditations on religion, current events and culture all in bite-sized nuggets.
Published on June 22, 2004 By FrankR2410 In Current Events
Yesterday, according to CNN, the Supreme Court decided that you may not withhold your name from the police. I have mixed feelings about this. On the one hand, in the age of terrorism, there is a genuine need to keep track of people. We simply cannot rely on the innate goodness of people, mainly because the evidence increasingly shows that such goodness doesn’t exist to the degree that we thought it did. (Basic Christianity has been teaching this for centuries.) On the other hand, I distrust the government’s ability to keep track of anyone. While at the present time, I strongly believe that the government’s motives are good; I don’t hold much hope that these good motives will continue indefinitely. History shows that when those in power have such methods at their disposal, sooner or later somebody’s going to take advantage of the situation. What’s the solution? I have some ideas, which I will put into my next post.
Comments
on Jun 22, 2004
I, honestly, like the new law. I don't see how it could harm to add it. It's kinda like the seatbelt law. All it can do is protect people.

Capt. over and out!
on Jun 23, 2004
It has always been law that you need to carry a photo ID in public if you are over 18.  (That is why States issue drivers licenses and ID cards for those who don't drive).  I see no reason why anyone should ever withhold their name from the police, anyway.  Seems like a common sense "law" to me.
on Jun 23, 2004
It has always been law that you need to carry a photo ID in public if you are over 18.


Are you sure about this? I have not heard of such a law.
on Jun 23, 2004
It has always been law that you need to carry a photo ID in public if you are over 18. (That is why States issue drivers licenses and ID cards for those who don't drive). I see no reason why anyone should ever withhold their name from the police, anyway. Seems like a common sense "law" to me.


Really? I got stopped for Jaywalking once and didnt have any id on me--nothing was said to me about it (and I managed to get out of the jaywalking ticket as well).

I'm surprised the Supreme Court would make this ruling. Seems like a clear violation of Miranda Rights--you have the right to remain silent.